linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8f433ee0-4dde-44db-cd36-fc2831b45df6@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:02:00 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
        Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function
 implementations

> I've dropped this entire series.  If you want me to consider it, you
> need to respin it with the following changes:

How do you think about to integrate any of my update suggestions
which you do not find controversial (or questionable) at the moment?


> 1) Put all similar corrections in a single patch.

I preferred an other patch granularity so far.

Regards,
Markus