[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1492741411.3041.23.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:23:31 -0400
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/29] IB/mlx: Fine-tuning for several function
implementations
On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 23:02 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >
> > I've dropped this entire series. If you want me to consider it,
> > you
> > need to respin it with the following changes:
>
> How do you think about to integrate any of my update suggestions
> which you do not find controversial (or questionable) at the moment?
No. Far too many of your patches need commit messages fixes and the
like. If you want me to include them, then follow all of the
requirements I gave you.
>
> >
> > 1) Put all similar corrections in a single patch.
>
> I preferred an other patch granularity so far.
Not to be too blunt about it, but your preference is not the one that
matters in this situation. If you want me to consider the patches,
then you need to respin them following the directions I gave.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Powered by blists - more mailing lists