[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca07b47e-8141-1691-169d-16c99d03902a@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:27:59 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Michael Ellerman <michaele@....ibm.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dipankar@...ibm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: powerpc KVM build break in linux-next (was Re: [PATCH
tip/core/rcu 40/40] srcu: Parallelize callback handling)
On 21/04/2017 06:17, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> Thanks, this looks perfect to me, and if you're happy to put it on top
>> of your tree that would limit the breakage to a smaller history window,
>> so that would be ideal.
>>
>> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> Thank you, Michael!
>
> Paolo, does this look good to you? My upstream maintainer will be much
> more likely to take this with your ack. ;-)
Sure,
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
since I don't expect conflicts between whoever applies this patch and
the KVM tree.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists