lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:27:59 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Michael Ellerman <michaele@....ibm.com> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, fweisbec@...il.com, bobby.prani@...il.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, josh@...htriplett.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, "paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org, dipankar@...ibm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, mingo@...nel.org Subject: Re: powerpc KVM build break in linux-next (was Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 40/40] srcu: Parallelize callback handling) On 21/04/2017 06:17, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> Thanks, this looks perfect to me, and if you're happy to put it on top >> of your tree that would limit the breakage to a smaller history window, >> so that would be ideal. >> >> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> > Thank you, Michael! > > Paolo, does this look good to you? My upstream maintainer will be much > more likely to take this with your ack. ;-) Sure, Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> since I don't expect conflicts between whoever applies this patch and the KVM tree. Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists