[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170421125135.GW3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 05:51:35 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <michaele@....ibm.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, bobby.prani@...il.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org,
josh@...htriplett.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dipankar@...ibm.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: powerpc KVM build break in linux-next (was Re: [PATCH
tip/core/rcu 40/40] srcu: Parallelize callback handling)
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:27:59AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 21/04/2017 06:17, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> Thanks, this looks perfect to me, and if you're happy to put it on top
> >> of your tree that would limit the breakage to a smaller history window,
> >> so that would be ideal.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > Thank you, Michael!
> >
> > Paolo, does this look good to you? My upstream maintainer will be much
> > more likely to take this with your ack. ;-)
>
> Sure,
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>
> since I don't expect conflicts between whoever applies this patch and
> the KVM tree.
Applied, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists