[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <87d1c5ynvy.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:09:21 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <michaele@....ibm.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
"paulus\@samba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dipankar@...ibm.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
"linuxppc-dev\@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
bobby.prani@...il.com, josh@...htriplett.org
Subject: Re: powerpc KVM build break in linux-next (was Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 40/40] srcu: Parallelize callback handling)
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 09:27:59AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 21/04/2017 06:17, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> >> Thanks, this looks perfect to me, and if you're happy to put it on top
>> >> of your tree that would limit the breakage to a smaller history window,
>> >> so that would be ideal.
>> >>
>> >> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
>> > Thank you, Michael!
>> >
>> > Paolo, does this look good to you? My upstream maintainer will be much
>> > more likely to take this with your ack. ;-)
>>
>> Sure,
>>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>
>> since I don't expect conflicts between whoever applies this patch and
>> the KVM tree.
>
> Applied, thank you!
Thanks all.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists