linux-kernel - Re: get_zone_device_page() in get_page() and page_cache_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170424180158.y26m3kgzhpmawbhg@node.shutemov.name>
Date:   Mon, 24 Apr 2017 21:01:58 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Dann Frazier <dann.frazier@...onical.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: get_zone_device_page() in get_page() and
 page_cache_get_speculative()

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:47:43AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> >> >> [   35.423841] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 245 at lib/percpu-refcount.c:155
> >> >> percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x1f5/0x200
> >> >
> >> > Okay, I've tracked it down. The issue is triggered by replacment
> >> > get_page() with page_cache_get_speculative().
> >> >
> >> > page_cache_get_speculative() doesn't have get_zone_device_page(). :-|
> >> >
> >> > And I think it's your bug, Dan: it's wrong to have
> >> > get_/put_zone_device_page() in get_/put_page(). I must be handled by
> >> > page_ref_* machinery to catch all cases where we manipulate with page
> >> > refcount.
> >>
> >> The page_ref conversion landed in 4.6 *after* the ZONE_DEVICE
> >> implementation that landed in 4.5, so there was a missed conversion of
> >> the zone-device reference counting to page_ref.
> >
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > But get_page_unless_zero() definitely predates ZONE_DEVICE. :)
> >
> 
> It does, but that's deliberate. A ZONE_DEVICE page never has a zero
> reference count, it's always owned by the device, never by the page
> allocator. ZONE_DEVICE overrides the ->lru list_head to store private
> device information and we rely on the behavior that a non-zero
> reference means the page is not added to any lru or page cache list.

So, what do you propose? Use get_page() instead of
page_cache_get_speculative() in GUP_fast() if the page belong to zone
device?

I don't like it. This situation, when we only can use subset of
helpers to manipulate page refcount creates situation waiting to explode.

I think it's still better to do it on page_ref_* level.

BTW, why do we need to pin pgmap from get_page() in first place?
I don't have enough background in ZONE_DEVICE.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov