[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afcddcbe-7086-2739-6de2-84f5c1d34374@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:45:48 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
swarren@...dotorg.org, balbi@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] soc/tegra: pmc: Use the new reset APIs to manage
reset controllers
On 04/24/2017 06:15 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 18/04/17 12:21, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Make use of reset_control_array_*() set of APIs to manage
>> an array of reset controllers available with the device.
> Before we apply this patch, I need to check to see if the order of the
> resets managed by the PMC driver matter. Today the order of the resets
> is determined by the order they appear in the DT node and although the
> new APIs work in the same way they do not guarantee this. So let me
> check to see if we can any concerns about ordering here. Otherwise would
> be nice to use these APIs.
Right, that will be perfect.
Best regards
Vivek
>
> Cheers
> Jon
>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists