[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170426105236.GJ27156@leverpostej>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:52:36 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
Cc: "Budankov, Alexey" <alexey.budankov@...el.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] optimize ctx switch with rb-tree
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:54:36AM -0700, David Carrillo-Cisneros wrote:
> Yes, seems like it would benefit from the rb-tree optimization.
> If you guys want to work on it, I'll be happy to help review.
Likewise.
I'd very much appreciate being Cc'd on changes in this area.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists