[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170426105356.GB857@amd>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:53:56 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org,
aaro.koskinen@....fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com,
patrikbachan@...il.com, serge@...lyn.com, abcloriens@...il.com,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: support autofocus / autogain in libv4l2
On Tue 2017-04-25 12:53:27, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 10:05 +0200, Pavel Machek a écrit :
> > Well, fd's are hard, because application can do fork() and now
> > interesting stuff happens. Threads are tricky, because now you have
> > locking etc.
> >
> > libv4l2 is designed to be LD_PRELOADED. That is not really feasible
> > with "complex" library.
>
> That is incorrect. The library propose an API where you simply replace
> certain low level calls, like ioctl -> v4l2_ioctl, open -> v4l2_open().
> You have to do that explicitly in your existing code. It does not
> abstract the API itself unlike libdrm.
You are right, no LD_PRELOAD. But same API as kernel, which is really
limiting -- see my other mail.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists