[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SG2PR06MB1165D46E83254B1757C790498A100@SG2PR06MB1165.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 10:48:45 +0000
From: Chris Brandt <Chris.Brandt@...esas.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 10/10] arm: dts: genmai: Add ethernet pin group
Hi Geert,
On Thursday, April 27, 2017, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > +ðer {
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <ðer_pins>;
> > +
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + renesas,no-ether-link;
> > + phy-handle = <&phy0>;
> > + phy0: ethernet-phy@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
>
> Shouldn't the interrupt (connected to P1_15) be described?
That interrupt pin from the PHY is not used. It did not need to be connected.
Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists