[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9019aebe-95ba-b1b8-65a9-5be927934218@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:20:34 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, lina.iyer@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for
power-domains
On 04/27/2017 03:12 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[]..
>>
>>> At qualcomm, we have an external M3 core (running its own firmware) which controls
>>> a few voltage rails (including AVS on those). The devices vote for the voltage levels
>
> Thanks for explicitly mentioning this, but ...
>
>>> (or performance levels) they need by passing an integer value to the M3 (not actual
>
> you contradict here, is it just voltage or performance(i.e. frequency)
> or both ? We need clarity there to choose the right representation.
Its just voltage.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists