[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84fc78c7-3a70-bf74-aa2c-c8b59e2adb3e@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:30:05 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/29] x86: assembly, use DATA_SIMPLE for data
Hi,
On 04/27/2017, 01:53 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> @@ -91,11 +91,11 @@ ENDPROC(do_suspend_lowlevel)
>>
>> .data
>> ALIGN
>> -ENTRY(saved_magic) .long 0
>> -ENTRY(saved_eip) .long 0
>> +SYM_DATA_SIMPLE(saved_magic, .long 0)
>> +SYM_DATA_SIMPLE_LOCAL(saved_eip, .long 0)
>>
>> # saved registers
>> -saved_idt: .long 0,0
>> -saved_ldt: .long 0
>> -saved_tss: .long 0
>> +SYM_DATA_SIMPLE_LOCAL(saved_idt, .long 0,0)
>> +SYM_DATA_SIMPLE_LOCAL(saved_ldt, .long 0)
>> +SYM_DATA_SIMPLE_LOCAL(saved_tss, .long 0)
>
> Do we really need to mark local data like that? It complicates the
> source code a bit...
Not really -- if the preferred way is not to annotate local symbols, I
can indeed remove that.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (855 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists