[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170427170030.GF1890@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:00:31 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...iumnetworks.com>, robin.murphy@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
jcm@...hat.com, linu.cherian@...ium.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, geethasowjanya.akula@...il.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, robert.richter@...ium.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, Geetha <gakula@...ium.com>,
sgoutham@...ium.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add workaround for Cavium
ThunderX2 erratum #74
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 05:42:37PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 05:16:23PM +0530, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Override the size, for Cavium CN99xx implementations
> > + * which doesn't support the page 1 SMMU register space.
> > + */
> > + cpu_model = read_cpuid_id() & MIDR_CPU_MODEL_MASK;
> > + if (cpu_model == MIDR_THUNDERX_99XX ||
> > + cpu_model == MIDR_BRCM_VULCAN)
> > + size = SZ_64K;
>
> If you're trying to identify an SMMU erratum, identify the SMMU, not the
> CPU it happens to be paired with this time.
>
> There are ID registers in the SMMU you can use to do so.
>
> NAK to using the CPU ID here.
Agreed. I had some off-list discussion with Geetha where we agreed to use
the "silicon ID", which I assumed was the SMMU IIDR register.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists