lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcdcc1cc-181c-8396-dd3c-dd40d0c7efc1@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:26:41 +0530
From:   Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION next-20170426] Commit 09515ef5ddad ("of/acpi:
 Configure dma operations at probe time for platform/amba/pci bus devices")
 causes oops in mvneta

Hi Ralph,

<snip..>

>>>>>
>>>>> Commit 09515ef5ddad ("of/acpi: Configure dma operations at probe
>>>>> time for platform/amba/pci bus devices") causes a kernel panic as
>>>>> in the log below on an armada-385. Reverting the commit fixes the
>>>>> issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Ralph    
>>>>
>>>> Somehow not getting a obvious clue on whats going wrong with the
>>>> logs below. From the log and looking in to dts, the drivers seems
>>>> to the one for "marvell,armada-370-neta".  
>>>
>>> Correct.
>>>   
>>>> Issue looks the data from the dma
>>>> has gone bad and subsequently referring the wrong data has resulted
>>>> in the crash. Looks like the dma_masks is the one going wrong.
>>>> Can i get some logs from mvneta_probe, about dev->dma_mask,
>>>> dev->coherent_dma_mask and dev->dma_ops with and without the patch
>>>> to see whats the difference ?  
>>>
>>> Not sure I understood what exactly you are after. Might be faster to
>>> just send me a patch with all debug print statements you like to
>>> see. 
>>
>> Attached the patch with debug prints.
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Sricharan
>>
> 
> Hi Sricharan
> 
> With commit 09515ef5ddad
> 
> [    1.288962] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->dma_mask 0xffffffff
> [    1.294827] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->coherent_dma_mask 0xffffffff
> [    1.301472] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->dma_ops 0x40b00c0601460
> 
> [    1.322047] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->dma_mask 0xffffffff
> [    1.327904] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->coherent_dma_mask 0xffffffff
> [    1.334549] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->dma_ops 0x40b00c0601460
> 
> 
> With the patch reverted, the build that works
> 
> [    1.289001] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->dma_mask 0xffffffff
> [    1.294866] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->coherent_dma_mask 0xffffffff
> [    1.301511] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->dma_ops 0x40b00c06014a8
> 
> [    1.317005] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->dma_mask 0xffffffff
> [    1.322867] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->coherent_dma_mask 0xffffffff
> [    1.329508] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->dma_ops 0x40b00c06014a8
> 

My bad, i think it is this patch missing [1], attached it as well.
Infact, this was in the series initially and got acked to get merged
separately well before the series. I should have sent this to Russell.
I will do this now. If this fixes up the issue,
i will take this patch separately, while this series gets tested
on -next.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9362113/

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

View attachment "0001-arm-dma-mapping-Don-t-override-dma_ops-in-arch_setup.patch" of type "text/plain" (2001 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ