[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170428142503.3b465425@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:25:03 +0200
From: Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>
To: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION next-20170426] Commit 09515ef5ddad ("of/acpi:
Configure dma operations at probe time for platform/amba/pci bus devices")
causes oops in mvneta
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:26:41 +0530
Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> <snip..>
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Commit 09515ef5ddad ("of/acpi: Configure dma operations at probe
> >>>>> time for platform/amba/pci bus devices") causes a kernel panic
> >>>>> as in the log below on an armada-385. Reverting the commit
> >>>>> fixes the issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> Ralph
> >>>>
> >>>> Somehow not getting a obvious clue on whats going wrong with the
> >>>> logs below. From the log and looking in to dts, the drivers seems
> >>>> to the one for "marvell,armada-370-neta".
> >>>
> >>> Correct.
> >>>
> >>>> Issue looks the data from the dma
> >>>> has gone bad and subsequently referring the wrong data has
> >>>> resulted in the crash. Looks like the dma_masks is the one going
> >>>> wrong. Can i get some logs from mvneta_probe, about
> >>>> dev->dma_mask, dev->coherent_dma_mask and dev->dma_ops with and
> >>>> without the patch to see whats the difference ?
> >>>
> >>> Not sure I understood what exactly you are after. Might be faster
> >>> to just send me a patch with all debug print statements you like
> >>> to see.
> >>
> >> Attached the patch with debug prints.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Sricharan
> >>
> >
> > Hi Sricharan
> >
> > With commit 09515ef5ddad
> >
> > [ 1.288962] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->dma_mask 0xffffffff
> > [ 1.294827] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->coherent_dma_mask
> > 0xffffffff [ 1.301472] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->dma_ops
> > 0x40b00c0601460
> >
> > [ 1.322047] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->dma_mask 0xffffffff
> > [ 1.327904] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->coherent_dma_mask
> > 0xffffffff [ 1.334549] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->dma_ops
> > 0x40b00c0601460
> >
> >
> > With the patch reverted, the build that works
> >
> > [ 1.289001] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->dma_mask 0xffffffff
> > [ 1.294866] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->coherent_dma_mask
> > 0xffffffff [ 1.301511] mvneta f1070000.ethernet: dev->dma_ops
> > 0x40b00c06014a8
> >
> > [ 1.317005] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->dma_mask 0xffffffff
> > [ 1.322867] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->coherent_dma_mask
> > 0xffffffff [ 1.329508] mvneta f1034000.ethernet: dev->dma_ops
> > 0x40b00c06014a8
>
> My bad, i think it is this patch missing [1], attached it as well.
> Infact, this was in the series initially and got acked to get merged
> separately well before the series. I should have sent this to Russell.
> I will do this now. If this fixes up the issue,
> i will take this patch separately, while this series gets tested
> on -next.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9362113/
>
With the attached patch,
0001-arm-dma-mapping-Don-t-override-dma_ops-in-arch_setup.patch, on top
of next all is well again.
Thanks
Ralph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists