[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4A628342-B33B-4730-889F-3D8F62037CB1@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 21:52:26 +0800
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: fix memory leak in __ceph_setxattr()
> On 28 Apr 2017, at 18:14, Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com> wrote:
>
> The ceph_inode_xattr needs to be released when removing an xattr. Easily
> reproducible running the 'generic/020' test from xfstests or simply by
> doing:
>
> attr -s attr0 -V 0 /mnt/test && attr -r attr0 /mnt/test
>
> While there, also fix the error path.
>
> Here's the kmemleak splat:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff88001f86fbc0 (size 64):
> comm "attr", pid 244, jiffies 4294904246 (age 98.464s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 40 fa 86 1f 00 88 ff ff 80 32 38 1f 00 88 ff ff @........28.....
> 00 01 00 00 00 00 ad de 00 02 00 00 00 00 ad de ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff81560199>] kmemleak_alloc+0x49/0xa0
> [<ffffffff810f3e5b>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x9b/0xf0
> [<ffffffff812b157e>] __ceph_setxattr+0x17e/0x820
> [<ffffffff812b1c57>] ceph_set_xattr_handler+0x37/0x40
> [<ffffffff8111fb4b>] __vfs_removexattr+0x4b/0x60
> [<ffffffff8111fd37>] vfs_removexattr+0x77/0xd0
> [<ffffffff8111fdd1>] removexattr+0x41/0x60
> [<ffffffff8111fe65>] path_removexattr+0x75/0xa0
> [<ffffffff81120aeb>] SyS_lremovexattr+0xb/0x10
> [<ffffffff81564b20>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.com>
> ---
> fs/ceph/xattr.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> index febc28f9e2c2..75267cdd5dfd 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> @@ -392,6 +392,7 @@ static int __set_xattr(struct ceph_inode_info *ci,
>
> if (update_xattr) {
> int err = 0;
> +
> if (xattr && (flags & XATTR_CREATE))
> err = -EEXIST;
> else if (!xattr && (flags & XATTR_REPLACE))
> @@ -399,12 +400,14 @@ static int __set_xattr(struct ceph_inode_info *ci,
> if (err) {
> kfree(name);
> kfree(val);
> + kfree(*newxattr);
> return err;
> }
> if (update_xattr < 0) {
> if (xattr)
> __remove_xattr(ci, xattr);
> kfree(name);
> + kfree(*newxattr);
> return 0;
> }
> }
Applied, thanks
Yan, Zheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists