lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 1 May 2017 14:02:46 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] mtd: nand: add manufacturer specific
 initialization/detection steps

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 02:01:25PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> A lot of NANDs are implementing generic features in a non-generic way,
> or are providing advanced auto-detection logic where the NAND ID bytes
> meaning changes with the NAND generation.
> 
> Providing this vendor specific initialization step will allow us to get
> rid of the full ids in the nand_ids table or all the vendor specific
> cases added over the time in the generic NAND ID decoding logic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  include/linux/mtd/nand.h     | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index efb3ade568d8..8f80faa57984 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c

...

> @@ -4163,6 +4196,10 @@ static int nand_detect(struct nand_chip *chip, struct nand_flash_dev *type)
>  	if (mtd->writesize > 512 && chip->cmdfunc == nand_command)
>  		chip->cmdfunc = nand_command_lp;
>  
> +	ret = nand_manufacturer_init(chip);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +

AFAICT, you're leaking anything that should be cleaned up in the
->cleanup() hook, for any error case after this. Not absolutely critical
to fix immediately, but I'd expect we should fix this in the 4.12 cycle.

>  	pr_info("device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x%02x, Chip ID: 0x%02x\n",
>  		maf_id, dev_id);
>  
> @@ -4907,6 +4944,10 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
>  	if (chip->badblock_pattern && chip->badblock_pattern->options
>  			& NAND_BBT_DYNAMICSTRUCT)
>  		kfree(chip->badblock_pattern);
> +
> +	/* Release manufacturer private data */
> +	if (chip->manufacturer.ops && chip->manufacturer.ops->cleanup)
> +		chip->manufacturer.ops->cleanup(chip);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_cleanup);
>  

[...]

Brian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ