[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170502110456.2b545823@bbrezillon>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 11:04:56 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] mtd: nand: add manufacturer specific
initialization/detection steps
On Mon, 1 May 2017 14:02:46 -0700
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 02:01:25PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > A lot of NANDs are implementing generic features in a non-generic way,
> > or are providing advanced auto-detection logic where the NAND ID bytes
> > meaning changes with the NAND generation.
> >
> > Providing this vendor specific initialization step will allow us to get
> > rid of the full ids in the nand_ids table or all the vendor specific
> > cases added over the time in the generic NAND ID decoding logic.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > index efb3ade568d8..8f80faa57984 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -4163,6 +4196,10 @@ static int nand_detect(struct nand_chip *chip, struct nand_flash_dev *type)
> > if (mtd->writesize > 512 && chip->cmdfunc == nand_command)
> > chip->cmdfunc = nand_command_lp;
> >
> > + ret = nand_manufacturer_init(chip);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
>
> AFAICT, you're leaking anything that should be cleaned up in the
> ->cleanup() hook, for any error case after this. Not absolutely critical
> to fix immediately, but I'd expect we should fix this in the 4.12 cycle.
Yep, already acked the patch. Thanks for the fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists