linux-kernel - [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170502075720.23570-1-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Tue,  2 May 2017 09:57:20 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     ooo@...ctrozaur.com, bhalevy@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries

The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.

Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.

Which beggs the question:  should we really leave the Supported status
in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 1bb06c5f7716..28dd83a1d9e2 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -9418,10 +9418,6 @@ F:	drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/
 
 OSD LIBRARY and FILESYSTEM
 M:	Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>
-M:	Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...marydata.com>
-L:	osd-dev@...n-osd.org
-W:	http://open-osd.org
-T:	git git://git.open-osd.org/open-osd.git
 S:	Maintained
 F:	drivers/scsi/osd/
 F:	include/scsi/osd_*
-- 
2.11.0