[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1493724812.2715.1.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 07:33:32 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, ooo@...ctrozaur.com,
bhalevy@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] MAINTAINERS: update OSD entries
On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 09:57 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The open-osd domain doesn't exist anymore, and mails to the list lead
> to really annoying bounced that repeat every day.
>
> Also the primarydata address for Benny bounces, and while I have a new
> one for him he doesn't seem to be maintaining the OSD code any more.
>
> Which beggs the question: should we really leave the Supported status
> in MAINTAINERS given that the code is barely maintained?
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1bb06c5f7716..28dd83a1d9e2 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -9418,10 +9418,6 @@ F: drivers/net/wireless/intersil/orinoco/
>
> OSD LIBRARY and FILESYSTEM
> M: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@...ctrozaur.com>
> -M: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...marydata.com>
> -L: osd-dev@...n-osd.org
> -W: http://open-osd.org
> -T: git git://git.open-osd.org/open-osd.git
> S: Maintained
> F: drivers/scsi/osd/
> F: include/scsi/osd_*
Hah, you beat me to it! I was going to spin up a patch for this today.
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists