linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as reviewer for Exynos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170502174448.hk4mn4udfmmkdwv7@kozik-lap>
Date:   Tue, 2 May 2017 19:44:48 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        javier@...hile0.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as reviewer for Exynos

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:01:07AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Adding myself as a reviewer for Exynos in the interest of keeping an
> eye on the Exynos platform and help keep it stable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Dear Shuah,

Thank you for the idea. Review and testing is always welcomed and much
appreciated. The entry in maintainers file is a little bit different
than just reviewing as that could be done also on mailing lists. Such
reviewer should be partially responsible for the Exynos ARM architecture
and even backup or replace maintainers. Quite frankly I must admit that
I am surprised because so far I did not see any contributions or reviews
from you before around Exynos SoC code, except recently media (which is
separate and not covered by me).

Best regards,
Krzysztof