linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as reviewer for Exynos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 May 2017 16:57:32 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        javier@...hile0.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as reviewer for Exynos

On 05/02/2017 11:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:01:07AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> Adding myself as a reviewer for Exynos in the interest of keeping an
>> eye on the Exynos platform and help keep it stable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Dear Shuah,
> 
> Thank you for the idea. Review and testing is always welcomed and much
> appreciated. The entry in maintainers file is a little bit different
> than just reviewing as that could be done also on mailing lists. Such
> reviewer should be partially responsible for the Exynos ARM architecture
> and even backup or replace maintainers. Quite frankly I must admit that
> I am surprised because so far I did not see any contributions or reviews
> from you before around Exynos SoC code, except recently media (which is
> separate and not covered by me).
> 

Thanks for your feedback.

-- Shuah