[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170503135406.5EA1E3FB6C@swsrvapps-01.diasemi.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 14:54:06 +0100
From: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
CC: Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: da7218: Fix incorrect usage of bitwise '&' operator for
SRM check
In the SRM lock check section of code the '&' bitwise operator is
used as part of checking lock status. Functionally the code works
as intended, but the conditional statement is a boolean comparison
so should really use '&&' logical operator instead. This commit
rectifies this discrepancy.
Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
---
sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
index d256ebf..6e1940e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7218.c
@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@ static int da7218_dai_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
++i;
msleep(DA7218_SRM_CHECK_DELAY);
}
- } while ((i < DA7218_SRM_CHECK_TRIES) & (!success));
+ } while ((i < DA7218_SRM_CHECK_TRIES) && (!success));
if (!success)
dev_warn(codec->dev, "SRM failed to lock\n");
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists