[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <71ca0408-4ec3-938c-2899-a4aa02ed3ab5@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 09:06:18 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...il.com>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
avi.kivity@...il.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect
On 04/05/2017 05:36, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Great.
>
> As there is no conflict between these two patchsets except dirty
> ring pages takes benefit from write-protect-all, i think they
> can be developed and iterated independently, right?
I can certainly start reviewing this one.
Paolo
> Or you prefer to merge dirty ring pages first then review the
> new version of this patchset later?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists