linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <66307755-c542-32fe-f88d-82cd4402353b@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 10:23:42 +0800
From:   Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...il.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
        avi.kivity@...il.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast write protect


Ping...

Sorry to disturb, just make this patchset not be missed. :)

On 05/04/2017 03:06 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/05/2017 05:36, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> Great.
>>
>> As there is no conflict between these two patchsets except dirty
>> ring pages takes benefit from write-protect-all, i think they
>> can be developed and iterated independently, right?
> 
> I can certainly start reviewing this one.
> 
> Paolo
> 
>> Or you prefer to merge dirty ring pages first then review the
>> new version of this patchset later?