[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170504001917.GM3780@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 17:19:17 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] Motorola Droid 4: Add WL1285C support
* Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk> [170503 09:11]:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:02:13PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > >> Motorola Droid 4 uses a WL1285C, as visible on iFixit [0]. This
> > >> fixes the DT file to use correct compatible for the wifi node
> > >> and adds the bluetooth node.
> > >>
> > >> [0] https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Motorola+Droid+4+Teardown/7759#s31961
> > >>
> > >> Changes to PATCHv1:
> > >> - use proper compatible value for bluetooth / shared transport
> > >> - add patches fixing wlcore compatible for Droid 4
> > >>
> > >> -- Sebastian
> > >>
> > >> Sebastian Reichel (4):
> > >> wlcore: add wl1285 compatible
> > >> ARM: dts: omap4-droid4: Use wl1285 for wifi compatible
> > >> Bluetooth: hci_ll: Add compatible values for more WL chips
> > >> ARM: dts: omap4-droid4: Add bluetooth
> > >
> > > For the series,
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> > so now the question is if we merge this through a single
> > maintainer or have each maintainer take the pieces? I would almost
> > suggest that Dave Miller takes this directly into net-next to make
> > this smoother.
>
> I think the only complex thing is, that patch 2 should only be
> applied after patch 1. So maybe patch 1 could be applied via
> wireless/net-next for 4.12 and the other ones go through the
> individual subsystems for 4.13?
Yeah removing dependencies where possible avoids pointless
merge conflicts later on.
Please send patches 1 and 2 together as a single patch to
Dave Miller and describe why it's needed for v4.12. The rest
can then get merged via the BT and DT trees.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists