[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1705031722350.76784@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 17:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] fs, epoll: short circuit fetching events if thread has been
killed
We've encountered zombies that are waiting for a thread to exit that are
looping in ep_poll() almost endlessly although there is a pending SIGKILL
as a result of a group exit.
This happens because we always find ep_events_available() and fetch more
events and never are able to check for signal_pending() that would break
from the loop and return -EINTR.
Special case fatal signals and break immediately to guarantee that we
loop to fetch more events and delay making a timely exit.
It would also be possible to simply move the check for signal_pending()
higher than checking for ep_events_available(), but there have been no
reports of delayed signal handling other than SIGKILL preventing zombies
from exiting that would be fixed by this.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -1748,6 +1748,16 @@ static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
* to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before doing the checks.
*/
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ /*
+ * Always short-circuit for fatal signals to allow
+ * threads to make a timely exit without the chance of
+ * finding more events available and fetching
+ * repeatedly.
+ */
+ if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+ res = -EINTR;
+ break;
+ }
if (ep_events_available(ep) || timed_out)
break;
if (signal_pending(current)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists