[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170504200928.GL24019@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 21:09:28 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Replace 14 seq_printf() calls by seq_puts()
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:54:16PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 13:20:47 +0200
>
> Some strings which did not contain data format specifications should be put
> into a sequence. Thus use the corresponding function "seq_puts".
debugfs / seq_file is not performance critical. Familiar idiomatic code is
much preferred over continually switching between seq_printf and seq_puts.
And don't even start on converting seq_printf / seq_puts to seq_putc...
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists