linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Combine substrings for a message in gen6_drpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 May 2017 21:12:32 +0100
From:   Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Combine substrings for a message in
 gen6_drpc_info()

On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:59:23PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 14:15:00 +0200
> 
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
> 
> WARNING: quoted string split across lines
> 
> Thus fix the affected source code place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 6f3119d40c50..dbd52ea89fb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -1529,8 +1529,8 @@ static int gen6_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m)
>  
>  	forcewake_count = READ_ONCE(dev_priv->uncore.fw_domain[FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER].wake_count);
>  	if (forcewake_count) {
> -		seq_puts(m, "RC information inaccurate because somebody "
> -			    "holds a forcewake reference \n");
> +		seq_puts(m,
> +			 "RC information inaccurate because somebody holds a forcewake reference.\n");

And now you break the 80col rule. Blind adherence to checkpatch is
impossible.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre