[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afe761e4-02f0-2218-fc61-f44c8e041f49@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 22:48:10 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Combine substrings for a message in
gen6_drpc_info()
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> @@ -1529,8 +1529,8 @@ static int gen6_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m)
>>
>> forcewake_count = READ_ONCE(dev_priv->uncore.fw_domain[FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER].wake_count);
>> if (forcewake_count) {
>> - seq_puts(m, "RC information inaccurate because somebody "
>> - "holds a forcewake reference \n");
>> + seq_puts(m,
>> + "RC information inaccurate because somebody holds a forcewake reference.\n");
>
> And now you break the 80col rule. Blind adherence to checkpatch is impossible.
Have you got any other coding style preferences around the grepping
of longer message strings from such source code?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists