lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afe761e4-02f0-2218-fc61-f44c8e041f49@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Thu, 4 May 2017 22:48:10 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915: Combine substrings for a message in
 gen6_drpc_info()

>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
>> @@ -1529,8 +1529,8 @@ static int gen6_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m)
>>  
>>  	forcewake_count = READ_ONCE(dev_priv->uncore.fw_domain[FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER].wake_count);
>>  	if (forcewake_count) {
>> -		seq_puts(m, "RC information inaccurate because somebody "
>> -			    "holds a forcewake reference \n");
>> +		seq_puts(m,
>> +			 "RC information inaccurate because somebody holds a forcewake reference.\n");
> 
> And now you break the 80col rule. Blind adherence to checkpatch is impossible.

Have you got any other coding style preferences around the grepping
of longer message strings from such source code?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ