[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 12:25:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mka@...omium.org, md@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, grundler@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
ghackmann@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for
multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:11:47AM -0700, tip-bot for Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Commit-ID: 121843eb02a6e2fa30aefab64bfe183c97230c75
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/121843eb02a6e2fa30aefab64bfe183c97230c75
> Author: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:47:41 -0700
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Fri, 5 May 2017 08:31:05 +0200
>
> x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility
>
> The constraint "rm" allows the compiler to put mix_const into memory.
> When the input operand is a memory location then MUL needs an operand
> size suffix, since Clang can't infer the multiplication width from the
> operand.
*sigh*, this is another shining example of how LLVM is a better, faster
moving compiler?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists