lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 May 2017 16:03:31 +0530
From:   Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] mailbox: Make startup and shutdown ops optional

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> Some mailbox hardware doesn't have to perform any additional operations
> on startup of shutdown, so make these optional.
>
Thanks, makes sense.

> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
> index 4671f8a12872..c88de953394a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,20 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart txdone_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
>         return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
>  }
>
> +static int mbox_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +       if (chan->mbox->ops->startup)
> +               return chan->mbox->ops->startup(chan);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mbox_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> +{
> +       if (chan->mbox->ops->shutdown)
> +               chan->mbox->ops->shutdown(chan);
> +}
> +
These functions are going to be called from exactly one place. So
maybe we simply do the check before startup/shutdown calls?

thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ