[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <76E35BA3-FEC9-46D6-B36F-554F464FA9ED@lightnvm.io>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 15:44:14 +0200
From: Javier González <jg@...htnvm.io>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Large latency on blk_queue_enter
> On 8 May 2017, at 14.27, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0200, Javier González wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I find an unusual added latency(~20-30ms) on blk_queue_enter when
>> allocating a request directly from the NVMe driver through
>> nvme_alloc_request. I could use some help confirming that this is a bug
>> and not an expected side effect due to something else.
>>
>> I can reproduce this latency consistently on LightNVM when mixing I/O
>> from pblk and I/O sent through an ioctl using liblightnvm, but I don't
>> see anything on the LightNVM side that could impact the request
>> allocation.
>>
>> When I have a 100% read workload sent from pblk, the max. latency is
>> constant throughout several runs at ~80us (which is normal for the media
>> we are using at bs=4k, qd=1). All pblk I/Os reach the nvme_nvm_submit_io
>> function on lightnvm.c., which uses nvme_alloc_request. When we send a
>> command from user space through an ioctl, then the max latency goes up
>> to ~20-30ms. This happens independently from the actual command
>> (IN/OUT). I tracked down the added latency down to the call
>> percpu_ref_tryget_live in blk_queue_enter. Seems that the queue
>> reference counter is not released as it should through blk_queue_exit in
>> blk_mq_alloc_request. For reference, all ioctl I/Os reach the
>> nvme_nvm_submit_user_cmd on lightnvm.c
>>
>> Do you have any idea about why this might happen? I can dig more into
>> it, but first I wanted to make sure that I am not missing any obvious
>> assumption, which would explain the reference counter to be held for a
>> longer time.
>
> You need to check if the .q_usage_counter is working at atomic mode.
> This counter is initialized as atomic mode, and finally switchs to
> percpu mode via percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu() in blk_register_queue().
Thanks for commenting Ming.
The .q_usage_counter is not working on atomic mode. The queue is
initialized normally through blk_register_queue() and the counter is
switched to percpu mode, as you mentioned. As I understand it, this is
how it should be, right?
Thanks,
Javier
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists