[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170508070646.GE17010@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 12:36:46 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, robh+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
mark.rutland@....com, mturquette@...libre.com,
jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
shunli.wang@...iatek.com, erin.lo@...iatek.com, jdelvare@...e.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] dt-bindings: cpufreq: enhance Mediatek cpufreq
dt-binding document
On 08-05-17, 14:58, Sean Wang wrote:
> > > + opp@...000000 {
> >
> > s/opp@...p-/
>
> I have referred to other dt-binding as examples where they also use opp@
> as the prefix word. e.g bindings/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.txt did it.
>
> Or I misunderstand something you pointed out here ?
Its on the way:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149266711829469&w=2
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists