linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: cpufreq: move Mediatek cpufreq dt-bindings document to proper place

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170508070826.GF17010@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 8 May 2017 12:38:26 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, robh+dt@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, mturquette@...libre.com,
        jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        shunli.wang@...iatek.com, erin.lo@...iatek.com, jdelvare@...e.de,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: cpufreq: move Mediatek cpufreq
 dt-bindings document to proper place

On 08-05-17, 14:19, Sean Wang wrote:
> Okay, I will do it with you provided command again. 
> 
> What I did for the patch is just "git mv
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/mt8173-cpu-dvfs.txt
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek.txt"
> and no any changing data in the content.

I was quite sure that you have done exactly that, but then we are
supposed to review and make sure you haven't done any mistakes.

That's where those options would make our life easier. Look at the
patch created by that command and you wouldn't see any diff at all.

-- 
viresh