linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/68] 3.18.52-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170509074724.g5x44rte7yxxlvy5@piout.net>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2017 09:47:24 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        shuahkh@....samsung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Jan Lübbe <jlu@...gutronix.de>,
        dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 00/68] 3.18.52-stable review

On 08/05/2017 at 11:13:51 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> + relevant soc/board maintainers
> 
> kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org> writes:
> 
> > stable-rc/linux-3.18.y boot: 77 boots: 2 failed, 75 passed (v3.18.51-69-gdab3331ef5e9)
> >
> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.51-69-gdab3331ef5e9/
> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.51-69-gdab3331ef5e9/
> >
> > Tree: stable-rc
> > Branch: linux-3.18.y
> > Git Describe: v3.18.51-69-gdab3331ef5e9
> > Git Commit: dab3331ef5e9aa7d0fa3a88776051028c2f1ed20
> > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > Tested: 14 unique boards, 8 SoC families, 20 builds out of 204
> >
> > Boot Failures Detected:
> >
> > arm:
> >
> >     at91_dt_defconfig
> >         at91sam9261ek: 1 failed lab
> 
> Alexandre, can you have a look at this one?
> 

I think we already solved that in a 4.x stable but I don't remember the
details right now. I'll check.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com