[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1494351185.30052.94.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 20:33:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <ibm-acpi@....eng.br>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] platform/x86: thinkpad_acpi: Join string
literals back
On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 14:10 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Thanks for review, my comments below.
> On Tue, 09 May 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > There is no point to keep string literal split. It even makes
> > slightly
> > harder to maintain and debug.
>
> Ooold code, from a time when random people would annoy others over
> 80-column instead of doing useful reviews...
Yes, I know, nowadays checkpatch doesn't complain on them.
> > While here, print negative error without changing a sign as it is a
> > common pattern in the kernel.
>
> A separate patch for this would be better: it would be easier to
> actually check that no functional changes crept in by mistake.
It doesn't make sense to me. It would touch same lines of code I do
already here and it's only one place, see below.
> > rc = fan_set_enable();
> > if (rc < 0) {
> > - pr_err("fan watchdog: error %d while enabling fan,
> > "
> > - "will try again later...\n", -rc);
> > + pr_err("fan watchdog: error %d while enabling fan,
> > will try again later...\n",
> > + rc);
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists