lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2017 10:33:12 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        bleung@...omium.org, olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: cros-ec: Add cros_ec_readmem() helpers for I2C/SPI
 based ECs

On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 09:34:56AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:56:14PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Moritz,
> > 
> > [auto build test WARNING on ljones-mfd/for-mfd-next]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> > 
> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Moritz-Fischer/mfd-cros-ec-Add-cros_ec_readmem-helpers-for-I2C-SPI-based-ECs/20170509-040606
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git for-mfd-next
> > config: tile-allmodconfig
> > compiler: tilegx-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.6.2
> > reproduce:
> >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         make.cross ARCH=tile  allmodconfig
> >         make.cross ARCH=tile 
> 
> I just locally ran that and it wouldn't print a warning. False positive?
> 
Good question. This is an unusual report - normally the actual warning ...

> > 
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > 
... would be listed here, but is missing.

Guenter

> > 
> > vim +279 drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c
> > 
> >    263		return 0;
> >    264	}
> >    265	EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_resume);
> >    266	
> >    267	#endif
> >    268	
> >    269	int cros_ec_readmem(struct cros_ec_device *ec, unsigned int offset,
> >    270				   unsigned int bytes, void *dest)
> >    271	{
> >    272		int ret;
> >    273		struct ec_params_read_memmap *params;
> >    274		struct cros_ec_command *msg;
> >    275	
> >    276		if (offset >= EC_MEMMAP_SIZE - bytes)
> >    277			return -EINVAL;
> >    278	
> >  > 279		msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*msg) + max(sizeof(*params), bytes), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> What am I not seeing here?
> >    280		if (!msg)
> >    281			return -ENOMEM;
> >    282	
> >    283		msg->version = 0;
> >    284		msg->command = EC_CMD_READ_MEMMAP;
> >    285		msg->insize = bytes;
> >    286		msg->outsize = sizeof(*params);
> >    287	
> > 
> > ---
> > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Moritz


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ