| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 08:35:00 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] KASLR: Handle memory limit specified by memmap
and mem option
On 05/09/17 at 10:39am, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Option mem= will limit the max address a system can use and any memory
> > region above the limit will be removed.
> >
> > Furthermore, memmap=nn[KMG] which has no offset specified has the same
> > behaviour as mem=.
> >
> > KASLR needs to consider this when choosing the random position for
> > decompressing the kernel.
> >
> > This patch implements that.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > index 106e13b..0637e85 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> > @@ -88,6 +88,10 @@ struct mem_vector {
> > static bool memmap_too_large;
> >
> >
> > +/* Store memory limit specified by "mem=nn[KMG]" or "memmap=nn[KMG]" */
> > +unsigned long long mem_limit = ULLONG_MAX;
> > +
> > +
> > enum mem_avoid_index {
> > MEM_AVOID_ZO_RANGE = 0,
> > MEM_AVOID_INITRD,
> > @@ -138,16 +142,24 @@ parse_memmap(char *p, unsigned long long *start, unsigned long long *size)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > switch (*p) {
> > - case '@':
> > - /* Skip this region, usable */
> > - *start = 0;
> > - *size = 0;
> > - return 0;
> > case '#':
> > case '$':
> > case '!':
> > *start = memparse(p + 1, &p);
> > return 0;
> > + case '@': /* Fall through: */
> > + /*
> > + * memmap=nn@ss specifies usable region, should be skipped
> > + */
> > + *size = 0;
>
> The "fall through" comment should go here (where the break is "missing").
Ah, OK, will change and repost after patch 1/3 reviewing. Thanks a lot!
>
> > + default:
> > + /*
> > + * If w/o offset, only size specified, memmap=nn[KMG] has the
> > + * same behaviour as mem=nn[KMG]. It limits the max address
> > + * system can use. Region above the limit should be avoided.
> > + */
> > + *start = 0;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -173,9 +185,14 @@ static void mem_avoid_memmap(char *str)
> > if (rc < 0)
> > break;
> > str = k;
> > - /* A usable region that should not be skipped */
> > - if (size == 0)
> > +
> > + if (start == 0) {
> > + /* Store the specified memory limit if size > 0 */
> > + if (size > 0)
> > + mem_limit = size;
> > +
> > continue;
> > + }
> >
> > mem_avoid[MEM_AVOID_MEMMAP_BEGIN + i].start = start;
> > mem_avoid[MEM_AVOID_MEMMAP_BEGIN + i].size = size;
> > @@ -187,19 +204,15 @@ static void mem_avoid_memmap(char *str)
> > memmap_too_large = true;
> > }
> >
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * handle_mem_memmap will also cover 'mem=' issue in next patch. Will remove
> > - * this note later.
> > - */
> > static int handle_mem_memmap(void)
> > {
> > char *args = (char *)get_cmd_line_ptr();
> > size_t len = strlen((char *)args);
> > char *tmp_cmdline;
> > char *param, *val;
> > + u64 mem_size;
> >
> > - if (!strstr(args, "memmap="))
> > + if (!strstr(args, "memmap=") && !strstr(args, "mem="))
> > return 0;
> >
> > tmp_cmdline = malloc(len + 1);
> > @@ -222,8 +235,20 @@ static int handle_mem_memmap(void)
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!strcmp(param, "memmap"))
> > + if (!strcmp(param, "memmap")) {
> > mem_avoid_memmap(val);
> > + } else if (!strcmp(param, "mem")) {
> > + char *p = val;
> > +
> > + if (!strcmp(p, "nopentium"))
> > + continue;
> > + mem_size = memparse(p, &p);
> > + if (mem_size == 0) {
> > + free(tmp_cmdline);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + mem_limit = mem_size;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > free(tmp_cmdline);
> > @@ -460,7 +485,8 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct boot_e820_entry *entry,
> > {
> > struct mem_vector region, overlap;
> > struct slot_area slot_area;
> > - unsigned long start_orig;
> > + unsigned long start_orig, end;
> > + struct boot_e820_entry cur_entry;
> >
> > /* Skip non-RAM entries. */
> > if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM)
> > @@ -474,8 +500,15 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct boot_e820_entry *entry,
> > if (entry->addr + entry->size < minimum)
> > return;
> >
> > - region.start = entry->addr;
> > - region.size = entry->size;
> > + /* Ignore entries above memory limit */
> > + end = min(entry->size + entry->addr, mem_limit);
> > + if (entry->addr >= end)
> > + return;
> > + cur_entry.addr = entry->addr;
> > + cur_entry.size = end - entry->addr;
> > +
> > + region.start = cur_entry.addr;
> > + region.size = cur_entry.size;
> >
> > /* Give up if slot area array is full. */
> > while (slot_area_index < MAX_SLOT_AREA) {
> > @@ -489,7 +522,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct boot_e820_entry *entry,
> > region.start = ALIGN(region.start, CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN);
> >
> > /* Did we raise the address above this e820 region? */
> > - if (region.start > entry->addr + entry->size)
> > + if (region.start > cur_entry.addr + cur_entry.size)
> > return;
> >
> > /* Reduce size by any delta from the original address. */
> > --
> > 2.5.5
> >
>
> Otherwise looks fine to me!
>
> -Kees
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists