linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] KASLR: Parse all memmap entries in cmdline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 14:29:42 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
cc:     mingo@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dyoung@...hat.com,
        douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, hpa@...or.com,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] KASLR: Parse all memmap entries in cmdline

On Tue, 9 May 2017, Baoquan He wrote:

> In commit:
> 
>   f28442497b5c ("x86/boot: Fix KASLR and memmap= collision")
> 
> ... the memmap= option is parsed so that KASLR can avoid those reserved
> regions. It uses cmdline_find_option() to get the value if memmap=
> is specified, however the problem is that cmdline_find_option() can only
> find the last entry if multiple memmap entries are provided. This
> is not correct.
> 
> In this patch, the whole cmdline will be scanned to search each

Can you please finally stop using this 'This patch does foo', 'In this
patch' phrases. They are bogus. We already know that this is a patch
otherwise you wouldn't have sent it.

See Documentation/process/SubmittingPatches.txt

Aside of that can you please use properly written out words instead of
using random abbreviations in the changelog, e.g. command line instead of
cmdline?

> memmap, all of them will be parsed and handled.

A proper example would be:

   Address this by checking each command line token for a "memmap=" match
   and parse each instance instead of using cmdline_find_option().

Thanks,

	tglx