[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a193RxchvFAMWeZiP0sc0bd+VGg=_aVvipSgcbDpHXojg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 10:08:46 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Red Hung <red.hung@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: pcie: Add documentation for Mediatek PCIe
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:07 AM, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com> wrote:
> +- ranges:
> + - The first three entries are expected to translate the addresses for the root
> + port registers, which are referenced by the assigned-addresses property of
> + the root port nodes (see below).
I don't understand this part. Why do you need a static translation for these?
Shouldn't they just be listed in the 'reg' property of the parent node now that
you have the clk/reset/phy properties in the parent as well?
> +Required properties:
> +- device_type: Must be "pci"
> +- assigned-addresses: Address and size of the port configuration registers
> +- reg: Only the first four bytes are used to refer to the correct bus number
> + and device number.
> +- #address-cells: Must be 3
> +- #size-cells: Must be 2
> +- #interrupt-cells: Must be 1
> +- interrupt-map-mask and interrupt-map: Standard PCI IRQ mapping properties
> + Please refer to the standard PCI bus binding document for a more detailed
> + explanation.
Child nodes do not normally have interrupt-map properties. Isn't this
already covered by the interrupt-map in the parent?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists