lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077536EC2F5@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 15:48:33 +0000
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     "'peterz@...radead.org'" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "'mingo@...hat.com'" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "'bp@...en8.de'" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "'acme@...nel.org'" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "'eranian@...gle.com'" <eranian@...gle.com>,
        "'jolsa@...nel.org'" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        "'ak@...ux.intel.com'" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5] perf/x86: add sysfs entry to freeze counter on SMI



> 
> > > > +static void flip_smm_bit(void *data) {
> > > > +	bool set = *(int *)data;
> 
> data points to an unsigned long. So while this works on LE machines this is
> still crap.

I will change the code as below.
+static void flip_smm_bit(void *data)
+{
+       unsigned long set = *(unsigned long *)data;
+
+       if (set > 0) {

> 
> > > > +	if (set) {
> > > > +		msr_set_bit(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR,
> > > > +			    DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_IN_SMM_BIT);
> > > > +	} else {
> > > > +		msr_clear_bit(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR,
> > > > +			      DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_IN_SMM_BIT);
> > > > +	}
> 
> I probably forgot, but why do we need an open coded version of __flip_bit()
> instead of reusing that?
> 
msr_set_bit/msr_clear_bit is enough for our requirement. There is no extra
work needed.
__flip_bit is static inline. If we want to directly use it, we have to expose
it by an additional patch. If so, we will have two sets of interfaces to flip MSR
bit. I think it's too much.
What do you think?

Thanks,
Kan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ