linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: typec: Fix sparse warnings about incorrect types

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHz_S76t8MRkwpJQ7=ekZAb6EiQz1+bvWQBjtNw04gO2Vjjbxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 May 2017 10:15:43 -0700
From:   Guru Das S <gurooodas@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>
Cc:     Yueyao Zhu <yueyao@...gle.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: typec: Fix sparse warnings about incorrect types

On 10 May 2017 at 08:23, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com> wrote:

> Please the patch into two parts, one per file; the required changes
> for endianness support in tcpci.c are much more complex.

I will send out a patch for the two simple fixes - the use of
pd_header_cnt_le().

> Excellent catch, but the fix is wrong. We don't want to change the
> endianness here, since the data is sent to the chip. This will require
> a (much) more comprehensive fix - header should probably be le16, the
> second parameter to tcpci_write16() needs to be le16, plus everything
> that comes with it (currently the code is just not endianness clean).
> tcpci_read16() is also incorrect and has the same problem (it is
> really a bad idea to read 16 bit into an unsigned int pointer).
>
> Let me know if you want to try to fix this; otherwise I'll do it.

Sure, I'd like to give this a try. I will take a closer look at the
code and get back to you with questions.