[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170511075825.GB19837@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 09:58:25 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fs: switch ->s_uuid to uuid_t
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:08:25PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > For some file systems we still memcpy into it, but in various places this
> > already allows us to use the proper uuid helpers. More to come..
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > ---
>
> Series looks good!
>
> My main concern is that filesystems with char uuid[16] are here to stay,
> or maybe, will be converted slowly.
I'll take a stab to convert them ASAP, and add s_uuid support for you
to more file systems once this initial series is done.
>
> Considering this, perhaps we should have a helper/macro to copy from
> char[16] to *uuid_t and maybe BUILD_BUG_ON the size comparison?
> #define bytes_to_uuid(dst, src) ...
If the mix of proper types and u8 arrays was to stay that'd be the way
to go, but I'd rather fix things up in a merge window or two instead
of leaving us in a transitionary state forever.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists