[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170511075926.GC19837@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 09:59:26 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] uuid: rename uuid types
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:15:51PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > +static inline int uuid_cmp(const uuid_t u1, const uuid_t u2)
> > {
> > - return memcmp(&u1, &u2, sizeof(uuid_be));
> > + return memcmp(&u1, &u2, sizeof(uuid_t));
> > }
> >
>
>
> I think we should use this opportunity to change these to (uuid_t *, uuid_t *)
> which is more in line with the rest of the helpers including the new helpers
> hoisted from xfs.
Or just kill them off - uuid/guid_equals is the better interface for all
existing users as far as I can tell. My updated series already kills
off the be/uuid one, the le/guid one will need a bit more work, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists