linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] arm64: dts: meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x: Fix node order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e50b3a0f-dab0-d2bc-26f2-a6edcc8af761@baylibre.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 10:17:01 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To:     Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] arm64: dts: meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x: Fix
 node order

On 05/13/2017 04:33 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Sort nodes referenced by label alphabetically.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
> ---
>  v1 -> v2:
>  * Rebased (new nodes added)
>  
>  .../dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts    | 52 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts
> index 8873c058fad2..6633a5d8fdd3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gxl-s905x-nexbox-a95x.dts
> @@ -140,10 +140,10 @@
>  	};
>  };
>  
> -&uart_AO {
> -	status = "okay";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&uart_ao_a_pins>;
> -	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +&cvbs_vdac_port {
> +	cvbs_vdac_out: endpoint {
> +		remote-endpoint = <&cvbs_connector_in>;
> +	};
>  };
>  
>  &ethmac {
> @@ -152,12 +152,32 @@
>  	phy-handle = <&internal_phy>;
>  };
>  
> +&hdmi_tx {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&hdmi_hpd_pins>, <&hdmi_i2c_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +};
> +
> +&hdmi_tx_tmds_port {
> +	hdmi_tx_tmds_out: endpoint {
> +		remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_connector_in>;
> +	};
> +};
> +
>  &ir {
>  	status = "okay";
>  	pinctrl-0 = <&remote_input_ao_pins>;
>  	pinctrl-names = "default";
>  };
>  
> +&pwm_ef {
> +	status = "okay";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pwm_e_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	clocks = <&clkc CLKID_FCLK_DIV4>;
> +	clock-names = "clkin0";
> +};
> +
>  /* Wireless SDIO Module */
>  &sd_emmc_a {
>  	status = "okay";
> @@ -217,28 +237,8 @@
>  	vqmmc-supply = <&vddio_boot>;
>  };
>  
> -&pwm_ef {
> -	status = "okay";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&pwm_e_pins>;
> -	pinctrl-names = "default";
> -	clocks = <&clkc CLKID_FCLK_DIV4>;
> -	clock-names = "clkin0";
> -};
> -
> -&cvbs_vdac_port {
> -	cvbs_vdac_out: endpoint {
> -		remote-endpoint = <&cvbs_connector_in>;
> -	};
> -};
> -
> -&hdmi_tx {
> +&uart_AO {
>  	status = "okay";
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&hdmi_hpd_pins>, <&hdmi_i2c_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&uart_ao_a_pins>;
>  	pinctrl-names = "default";
>  };
> -
> -&hdmi_tx_tmds_port {
> -	hdmi_tx_tmds_out: endpoint {
> -		remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_connector_in>;
> -	};
> -};
> 

Hi Andreas,

Like a previous attempt, I'm not OK with such rework since it will break bisect and add complexity for new patches handling.

The order is not alphabetically ordered, live with it.

Neil