[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6542edb0-8160-4963-ff59-b631d49e7b84@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 20:56:53 +0200
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/18] arm64: dts: meson-gxbb: Fix node order
Am 15.05.2017 um 10:17 schrieb Neil Armstrong:
> Like a previous attempt, I'm not OK with such rework since it will break bisect and add complexity for new patches handling.
>
> The order is not alphabetically ordered, live with it.
No. I was the one to add GXBB, so you live with my preferences, don't
make my stuff ugly. What you do in your Nexboxes and reference boards is
a different question.
Also this certainly does not break bisect!
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists