lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-502ce005ab95d5d9481768649dbab808845b24d7@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2017 02:12:43 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     clm@...com, efault@....de, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of
 leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs

Commit-ID:  502ce005ab95d5d9481768649dbab808845b24d7
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/502ce005ab95d5d9481768649dbab808845b24d7
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 4 May 2017 15:31:22 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:15:35 +0200

sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs

In order to allow leaf_cfs_rq_list to remove entries switch the
bandwidth hotplug code over to the task_groups list.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170504133122.a6qjlj3hlblbjxux@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index eede181..c8fa777 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4642,24 +4642,43 @@ static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 	hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->slack_timer);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Both these cpu hotplug callbacks race against unregister_fair_sched_group()
+ *
+ * The race is harmless, since modifying bandwidth settings of unhooked group
+ * bits doesn't do much.
+ */
+
+/* cpu online calback */
 static void __maybe_unused update_runtime_enabled(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+	struct task_group *tg;
 
-	for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
-		struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth;
+	lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tg, &task_groups, list) {
+		struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = &tg->cfs_bandwidth;
+		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[cpu_of(rq)];
 
 		raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
 		cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = cfs_b->quota != RUNTIME_INF;
 		raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+/* cpu offline callback */
 static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
 {
-	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
+	struct task_group *tg;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tg, &task_groups, list) {
+		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[cpu_of(rq)];
 
-	for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
 		if (!cfs_rq->runtime_enabled)
 			continue;
 
@@ -4677,6 +4696,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq)
 		if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
 			unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 #else /* CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH */

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ