[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705151225030.2027@nanos>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 12:25:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch 07/18] ACPI: Adjust system_state check
On Mon, 15 May 2017, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 08:27:23PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > To enable smp_processor_id() and might_sleep() debug checks earlier, it's
> > required to add system states between SYSTEM_BOOTING and SYSTEM_RUNNING.
> >
> > Make the decision wether a pci root is hotplugged depend on SYSTEM_RUNNING
> > instead of !SYSTEM_BOOTING.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> This looks sane to me, but I assume this was meant to be Cc'd to the
> ACPI folk rather than the arm64 folk?
Indeed.
> Mark.
>
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> > @@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi
> > struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> > acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> > int no_aspm = 0;
> > - bool hotadd = system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING;
> > + bool hotadd = system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING;
> >
> > root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!root)
> >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists