linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq:- Handle return value of clk_prepare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8f21257b-f20a-f2cd-3d56-bebe51aad946@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 May 2017 11:20:26 +0530
From:   Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq:- Handle return value of
 clk_prepare_enable

Yes, I will add check for powersave clk.

Thanks
- Arvind

On Wednesday 17 May 2017 10:04 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-05-17, 12:41, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> Here, Clock enable can failed. So adding an error check for
>> clk_prepare_enable.
> Rewrite it as:
>
> clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> index 1b9bcd7..4c30103 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -127,7 +127,12 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   		return PTR_ERR(priv.cpu_clk);
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	clk_prepare_enable(priv.cpu_clk);
>> +	err = clk_prepare_enable(priv.cpu_clk);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		dev_err(priv.dev, "Unable to prepare cpuclk\n");
>> +		return err;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	kirkwood_freq_table[0].frequency = clk_get_rate(priv.cpu_clk) / 1000;
>>   
>>   	priv.ddr_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "ddrclk");
>> @@ -137,7 +142,11 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   		goto out_cpu;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	clk_prepare_enable(priv.ddr_clk);
>> +	err = clk_prepare_enable(priv.ddr_clk);
>> +	if (err) {
>> +		dev_err(priv.dev, "Unable to prepare ddrclk\n");
>> +		goto out_cpu;
>> +	}
>>   	kirkwood_freq_table[1].frequency = clk_get_rate(priv.ddr_clk) / 1000;
>>   
>>   	priv.powersave_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "powersave");
> There is one more prepare-enable after this. Why not fix that as well
> ?
>